Step 1
Opening argument
Technology undoubtedly exacerbates inequality. Those with access to advanced technology enjoy improved education, healthcare, and economic opportunities, creating a divide between them and those without such access. The wealthier individuals and countries invest more in technology, widening the gap as they continue to advance. Meanwhile, marginalized communities struggle to catch up, reinforcing existing disparities. The digital divide thus contributes to a cycle where the rich get richer, and the poor are left further behind, unable to compete on equal footing.
Step 2
Opening argument
So if technology exacerbates inequality instead of helping people, we should get rid of it, right?
Step 3
Rebuttal
Getting rid of technology isn't the solution. Instead, we should focus on ensuring equitable access to technological resources for everyone. By bridging the digital divide through policies and initiatives that provide technology and education to underprivileged communities, we can reduce inequality. The goal should be to harness the benefits of technology to uplift those who are disadvantaged, thereby creating more equal opportunities.
Step 4
Rebuttal
I simply can't agree with this argument. If providing more technology to underprivileged communities somehow reduces inequality, then technology cannot exacerbate inequality. If it really did, that would mean more of it would exacerbate inequality more, meaning providing it to underprivileged communities would be bad, you can't believe both.
The fact is that the lack of technology, the lack of access to any resource, exacerbates inequality, not the existence of the resource. It's like arguing bread exacerbates inequality because some people don't have bread. It's not a question of the technology itself, but any resource.