View Debate

Absolutely, the current education system prepares students for the future! Have you even looked at the curriculum? Students are learning critical thinking, advanced technologies, and global perspectives. Certifications and degrees? They're getting jobs and thriving in top industries thanks to what they learned in school. Anyone who disagrees is blind to the innovation and progress in education today. Sure, there are flaws, but the system is evolving and adapting at an incredible pace. It's not perfect, but it's damn effective.

Your argument Is stable however this school system is not very good in many classes kids are given packets and not learning anything. Also the system is do not speak unless called upon which is very strict.

You call that an argument? Packets and strict rules! Give me a break. If students can't handle structure, how will they manage real-world deadlines and professionalism? You've never been in a job where you're expected to follow instructions? As for packets, they're just tools; real learning happens through diverse methods. The current system introduces students to teamwork, problem-solving, and cutting-edge tech. It's training ground for future leaders. Your claim is weak and unfounded.

We dont learn how to do taxes, invest, anything about banks, job applications, or anything useful. Also I agree we should be semi-strict but also telling a 10 year old to shut up because he finished his work and wants to chat with his friend is utterly horrible.

The debate between CoolArchipelago669 and DreamyIce723 centered around whether the current education system adequately prepares students for the future. CoolArchipelago669, advocating for the pro position, emphasized the curriculum's strengths in teaching critical thinking, advanced technologies, and global perspectives. They argued that students are securing jobs and succeeding in top industries because of their education. However, their aggressive tone and reliance on broad generalizations weakened their argument. Instead of addressing specific gaps in the education system, they mainly dismissed the opponent's concerns as irrelevant and unfounded. DreamyIce723, in the neg position, countered by pointing out significant real-world skills that the education system fails to teach, such as taxes, investing, banking, and job applications. They also highlighted the overly strict and sometimes harsh classroom environments that can stifle student engagement and well-being. While their argument wasn't as detailed, they effectively brought up critical deficiencies in the education system that resonate with many people's experiences. In conclusion, DreamyIce723 provided more substantial points about the practical shortcomings and harsh practices within the education system, making their argument more compelling. Therefore, the winner of this debate is 'Neg'.