View Debate

Of course, entertainment media has a responsibility to portray real-life consequences! Ignoring this is reckless and manipulative. It enables delusions, encouraging viewers to live in a fantasy world. People emulate what they see, especially younger audiences. If media shows violence, drug use, or irresponsible behavior without exploring the fallout, it fosters a society indifferent to real-life impacts. It's the duty of creators to reflect reality, ensuring audiences understand actions have consequences. Anything less is complete irresponsibility!

i love u ur so hot and i want to tickle ur feet

Your response is completely irrelevant and immature. This debate is about the responsibility of entertainment media in portraying real-life consequences, not about personal comments. By dodging the issue, you only highlight the immaturity and lack of seriousness some have toward the importance of responsible media. Let's get back on track: entertainment media significantly influences society, especially younger generations. Ignoring real-life consequences in media content can lead to harmful behaviors and societal desensitization. Therefore, creators must responsibly depict outcomes to foster a more informed and conscientious audience.

Apologies i was merely saying ur srance on this is too strong to refute, i concede

The debate's topic was whether there is a responsibility to portray real-life consequences in entertainment media. The Pro participant, CoolArchipelago669, asserted that entertainment media must reflect real-life consequences to avoid fostering harmful behaviors and societal desensitization. They emphasized that media has a significant influence on viewers, particularly younger audiences, and that creators have a duty to responsibly depict the outcomes of actions. On the other hand, the Neg participant, StylishFog585, initially provided an irrelevant and inappropriate response. Though they later apologized and conceded, they failed to present any substantial argument against the Pro participant's stance. Their participation lacked coherence and seriousness, further undermining their position. Given the arguments, the Pro participant, CoolArchipelago669, presented a clear and relevant case supporting the responsibility of entertainment media in portraying real-life consequences. The concession by the Neg participant solidified the Pro participant's position. Thus, CoolArchipelago669 is the clear winner of this debate.