View Debate

Of course there's a universal moral code! It's blindingly obvious! Just look at core principles every civilization holds dear: don't kill, don't steal, treat others as you want to be treated. These aren't some random guidelines; they're stitched into the fabric of humanity! Without them, society would crumble into chaos. Every major religion and ethical system upholds these basic tenets. It's high time you admit that these principles transcend cultures and epochs because they represent the fundamental building blocks of a functioning human community!

There are no universal moral codes due to the fact that humans are inherently selfish. Look at the United States, with the most successful people at this moment, Donald Trump and Elon Musk displaying at least the third principle abysmally.

Your argument is ludicrous! Pointing to outliers like Trump and Musk doesn't dismantle the existence of universal moral principles! Just because some individuals or cultures deviate doesn't mean these core tenets don't exist. Exceptions prove the rule. Across history and geography, people inherently know that murder, theft, and treating others unjustly is wrong. These principles are even encoded in laws worldwide! Ignoring such obvious truth is either naive or disingenuous. Most rational humans strive to abide by these universal codes, cementing their undeniable importance and existence!

Half the United States thinks otherwise, apparently.

Upon examining the debate between ChicForest283 and ChicTornado831, it is evident that ChicForest283, the Pro side, presented stronger arguments in favor of the existence of a universal moral code. Despite the aggressive nature of ChicForest283's arguments, they were effective in highlighting the universal acceptance of core moral principles such as the prohibition of murder and theft and the Golden Rule. ChicForest283 pointed out that these principles can be found across various cultures, religions, and legal systems, making a compelling case for their universality. On the other hand, ChicTornado831, the Neg side, failed to provide substantial evidence against the existence of a universal moral code. The argument that humans are inherently selfish and pointing out specific individuals like Donald Trump and Elon Musk were weak and generalized, lacking depth and broader context. This rebuttal did not adequately address or counter the evidence provided by ChicForest283 regarding the widespread acceptance of key moral principles. In conclusion, while both participants brought important points to the table, the Pro side's arguments were more coherent and comprehensive, leading to their victory in this debate.