View Debate

Absolutely, violent video games should be banned! The evidence is unchecked and overwhelming: these games breed aggression and anti-social behavior in their players. Look around you! Just the act of engaging in these mind-rotting pastimes escalates the rates of real-world violence and desensitizes young minds to brutality. Are you seriously okay with children growing up thinking that shooting someone or causing harm is just part of the 'game'? The slippery slope is real, and it starts with a joystick in hand. We must prioritize societal well-being over the warped notion of 'entertainment' that glorifies gore and violence. Ban them now before it's too late!

There is a thing in America called the first amendment. Freedom of expression. And games are ultimately a form of expression, not a form of violence. People can also choose not to play the game, so breeding aggression should not be blamed on the developer, but the people who choose to play them. banning video games is against the first amendment.

Freedom of expression doesn't give a free pass to everything under the sun, especially when it comes to public harm. Just like we have restrictions on hate speech and obscenity, we need limits on forms of "expression" that actively harm society. Developers are not innocent bystanders; they meticulously design these games to be addictive and engaging, often prioritizing violence for shock value and sales. Claiming it's a matter of personal choice is naive when we know that these violent games have a profound impact on developing minds. Society has a duty to protect its members, particularly its youth, from harmful influences—even if it means stepping on a few toes. The First Amendment has its boundaries, and it's time violent video games are pushed outside of them.

I think you are wrong because first, all games are made to be addicting, so your first claim is wrong. second of all, we can have education to not play those games, but the developers can still make the games. Just like the fact that some things are legal but they do harm. For example, hamburgers. Hamburgers make you gain obesity which is harm, but why do they not ban hamburgers? Well because it is up to the person to decide not to eat the hamburger and gain obesity. That's also why we can have education telling children not to eat unhealthy foods, but we can't ultimately tell people to not produce those foods. The same can be applied to violent video games. Just pretend violent video games are junk food. Would you ban junk food?

ChicForest283 primarily relies on emotional and moral arguments to advocate for banning violent video games, focusing on the potential harm to youth and society. However, their arguments lack compelling evidence and are weakened by logical counterpoints. MagnificentArchipelago648 effectively counters by emphasizing the importance of the First Amendment and drawing parallels to other harmful but legal products, arguing for education over outright bans. Although their argument could benefit from addressing the emotional concerns raised by ChicForest283, their logical and comparative approach is strong.